Tuesday, May 5, 2009

TOP 5 INTERESTING FACTS & FIGURES FROM APRIL 2009'S GLOBAL AUTO SALES STATS

Attempts to force GoodCarBadCar.net back onto the typical Lowdown or $$$ Mondays, Top 5 Tuesdays, 3 To Beat Wednesdays, Numbers Thursdays and Across The Pond Fridays have been difficult withthe move of GoodCarBadCar Towers and an ignited effort of TGCG at hypercube.ca. This being Tuesday, however, and a day near the beginning of the month (Happy Cinco de Mayo), The Good Car Guy is intelligent enough to connect a Top 5 with Sales Stats.

Read on for the most fascinating and/or ironic facts related to the sale of automobiles around the world.

-----

#5 - 73.70% @ SUZUKI USA: During the 30 days of April/2008, Suzuki sold 9,669 vehicles. This year, the same number of selling days (26) resulted in just 2,543 vehicles sold to American consumers.

#4 - 3,154 @ TOYOTA USA: With sales down 42,19%, on average, Toyota sold 3,154 fewer cars each day in April of 2009 than they could muster in April of '08 when 7,475 vehicles exited dealer doors across America each day.

#3 - 8,595 @ BUICK CHINA: All tolled, General Motors sales in Canada were down 23.6% to 29,476. Buick sales in China were up a hugely significant 63.6%, taking Chinese Buick sales to 38,071. That makes GM's Buick division better in China than all of GM is in Canada to the tune of 8,595 extra vehicles.

#2 - 203,000 @ TATA: So far, approximate sales revenue from the Tata Nano $512,600,000 on sales of 203,000 Tata Nanos in India.

#1 - 184,706 @ TOTAL FRANCE: While total French "light-vehicle" sales were down 7% compared with April of last year, Citroen (+1.8%), Suzuki (+3.1%), Hyundai/Kia (+6.1%) Dacia (+15.2%), Volkswagen (+16%) Audi (+20.7%), and Seat (+23.7%) posted gains. BMW sales in France were shot through the floor (-43.9%) while Opel fared slightly better with a year-over-year drop of 41.2%.
Monday, May 4, 2009

CANADA AUTO SALES FACTS AND FIGURES FROM APRIL OF '09

One predictable sign of rough times arises when business, governments, and even families begin to alter definitions or use new terms altogether. Nova Scotia has passed a bill that retroactively changes what a budget deficit really means, for example. Automakers which haven't posted a year-over-year sales increase in what seems like years now tend to compare their figures - when possible - to the month before, rather than the equivalent period of a year earlier. It helps these automakers to spin positive news out of terrible news. General Motors, in this case, sold more cars than in April than in March. Forget that April/2009 sales were much lower than April/2008 sales, down 23.6% in Canada and 34.5% in the USA.

Let's put it this way: believe what you hear; but take a deeper look. No time to take a deeper look? That's fine - The Good Car Guy has done it for you. In Canada, a deeper look reveals some very interesting figures. Keep reading to get the backstage story.

-----

2,718 - total Toyota RAV4s sold in April of 2009 in Canada (thanks to the availability of new front-wheel drive models), which is almost 1,100 more than all Lexus Canada sales

948 - total Toyota Venza sales in April of 2009 in Canada, representing the third consecutive month of increased Venza sales

4.7 - percentage gain in Chevrolet Silverado/GMC Sierra truck sales in Canada this April compared with April of '08

133 - total Audi Q7 sales in April in Canada, making the large SUV Audi's fourth-best selling vehicle in April with sales beating the combined effort of Audi's R8, A8 & S8, A6 & S6, and the TT

2,517 - total Daimler sales in Canada in April, represented by Mercedes-Benz and smart, which makes April of 2009 the best-ever April for the brand(s)

24.4 - percentage gain posted by the Ford Fusion compared with the equivalent period of a year earlier

1,017 - total Kia Soul sales in April, representing about 1/4 of all Kia Canada sales

35.9 - percentage increase in the year-over-year sales of the Subaru Forester, helping Subaru (up 4.1%) become one of few automakers to sell more cars this April than last

1,065 - total Nissan Rogue sales, easily outselling its Nissan "truck" counterparts combined sales of 749

6,443 - total Honda Civic sales in April of 2009 in Canada, almost topping Nissan's total sales and definitely outdoing the lower 17 brands in April's Sales Stats post

16 - total sales of up-and-coming, mould-breaking, status-quo defeating Nissan GT-R and Audi R8, with 8 units pushed into Canadian hands each

FIAT WANTS MORE THAN CHRYSLER - GM EUROPE'S VAUXHALL, OPEL & SAAB TOO

Quick alert for early morning readers. It's becoming more than just rumour and innuendo. Fiat wants to grab hold of more than just Chrysler LLC. General Motors Europe-based brands are also now part of a future Fiat conglomerate. In other words, Fiat wants to become the GM of yesteryear.

Mergers and acquisitions like this would make Fiat gigantic. Brands under the umbrella would include, in one form or another: Fiat, Alfa Romeo, Lancia, Maserati, Ferrari, Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, Opel, Vauxhall, and Saab. Fiat is already big in commercial vehicles with names like Iveco likely meaning something to you. Fiat used to play around with Piaggio and Vespa scooters, too. Famed ski resort Sestriere is an Agnelli family stronghold. Various ventures nd tie-ups help Fiat make an indelliblible mark in wildly varying segments of the economy all over the world.

But a Fiat that includes brands like Saab and Chrysler? This'll be news worth watching. Catch the CNN story here.
Sunday, May 3, 2009

CANADA AUTO SALES APRIL 2009

Overall vehicle sales took a beating in Canada last month. The thirty days of April revealed serious downswings by the vast majority of automakers competing in Canada, when compared with statistics for April of 2008. Not surprisingly, Hyundai and Kia were top notch performers along with Mercedes-Benz. Honda fared shockingly poorly. For all the Numbers, keep reading. Find previous instances of this same type of post by clicking for Sales Stats here.

-----

General Motors: -23.6% to 29,476
Toyota: -17.9% to 19,599
Ford: -10.5% to 18,782
Chrysler: -36.8% to 15,242
Honda: -27.7% to 11,865
Hyundai: +14.8% to 10,809
Mazda: -10.1% to 8,195
Nissan: -17.8% to 6,532
Kia: +15% to 4,276
Volkswagen: +3.4% to 3,496
Mercedes-Benz: +21.3% to 2,267
Subaru: +4.1% to 2,050
BMW: -16.4% to 1,931
Mitsubishi: -4.8% to 1,844
Lexus: +4% to 1,621
Acura: -36.6% to 1,430
Audi: +10.9% to 1,251
Suzuki: -36.8% to 917
Volvo: -20.1% to 613
Infiniti: -40% to 542
Mini: -19.7% to 366
Porsche: -15.5% to 191
Saab: +14.3% to 160
Land Rover: -31.7% to 138
Jaguar: -22.1% to 88
Friday, May 1, 2009

PONTIAC DIES; FIAT ARRIVES


"Sadly ironic" would be a suitable phrase for the likely occurrence of Pontiac being put out to pasture just as Fiat arrives in the barnyard in 2010. Both scenarios are brought on as a result of two once-gigantic companies realigning themselves for an era of much smaller automotive sales in the USA. Of course, Fiat's arrival will come on the heels of Chrysler's bankruptcy while Pontiac's death hits home because General Motors is far too large and needs to shrink somewhere. Or rather, somewhere(s). Oldsmobile is already dead. Hummer, Saab, and Saturn will be very different companies by 2011, as well.

What is it about Fiat that makes it a probable success in North America that wasn't true with Pontiac? In January, Pontiac sold 9,104 cars, positioning the brand as the 18th best-seller in America that month. Mini sold 2,082 vehicles. Fiat's 500 - the Cinquecento - is a relatively direct competitor for the Mini Cooper. 20,000 sales per annum seems possible. That'd be about 1,666 for Fiat's highest-profile car.

The Panda, Grande Punto, and Bravo are also obvious contenders for North America. Rumour has it that Jeep wants the Panda 4x4. GoodCarBadCar wants the Panda 100HP. The Grande Punto is gorgeous but, with the 500 and Panda, would be the equivalent in North America of Honda selling the Fit, a tall Fit, and a small and stylish Fit. Possible? Yes. Possibly successful? Maybe. Possibly superflous? Yes.

The Bravo, if trunked, would be thrown into the ring with the Honda Civic, Toyota Corolla, Chevrolet Cruze, Ford Focus, Mitsubishi Lancer, Suzuki SX4, Hyundai Elantra, Kia Forte, Nissan Sentra, and Mazda3, among others. Its novelty factor rests upon one item: its badge; which for some people is actually a turn-off. It is not a class leader in Europe as it stands.

In other words, could Fiat sell 10,000 cars per month in America? Of course, Pontiac's problem wasn't the 9,104 cars sold in January. It was the fact that the 9,104 figure was 62% lower than the sales stat from January of '08. Importing Fiats to North America is a much more in-depth process than the American media wants to make it out to be. President Obama doesn't simply hand a pen to the UAW, Canadian government, Treasury department, and Fiat boss Sergio Marchionne for us to see 500s and Pandas appearing in New Jersey.

Crash tests, engine/emission certification, dealer set-up.... all of these things must happen. And whether they can be fast-tracked or not, these things take time and LOTS of money. Thanks to General Motors, Fiat made $2,000,000,000 a few years ago just for GM not to buy it. $2B sounds like a lot. Fiat, however, is a volume player everywhere else. Volume in America should mean 10,000+ sales per month. If Fiat wants to play niche like Mini or smart or even luxury brands like Audi or Porsche, the prices will rise. Then Fiat in North America won't be the value brand it is everywhere else. And after the novelty wears off, nobody will pay Mini Cooper prices for a Fiat 500.

Is this an argument against the potential success of Fiat? Just because Pontiac died, Fiat will too? Of course not, the brands have little in common. Nonetheless, a brand that failed here once and failed miserably in many other parts of the globe multiple times over isn't the knight in shining armour the Obama administration (and Cinquecento lovers) would lead you to believe. Fiat isn't bagging Chrysler out of charity, after all. It's a business decision. Why would Fiat take on an obvious charity case if Fiat didn't need to? Ah. Perhaps Fiat needs Chrysler, if not as much as Chrysler needs Fiat, at least enough to make Marchionne look more seriously at Opel possibilities, too.
Tuesday, April 28, 2009

GALLERY - ASTON MARTIN ONE-77 IN 15 PICS

Let's get the bad news out of the way first and foremost. Aston Martin's new flagship; its most extreme car; the "ultimate expression of Aston Martin", is the fourth-best looking model in the Aston Martin range. Keep in mind, Aston Martin, with the advent of the One-77, builds four cars. At the bottom of the range, you have the V8 Vantage and its roadster companion. The Vantage is achingly, drop-dead gorgeous. Moving up, you'll find the DB9 and DB9 Volante. Both the hardtop and convertible are classically drop-dead gorgeous. Another rung up, Aston Martin sells the DBS, a hard-core version of the DB9. It looks very, very good.

The One-77 is a shocking and striking car. There are more reasons to like the look of the One-77 then there are to hate the look of the One-77. Yet its appearance is almost an Aston Martin caricature. Like a New York Times political cartoon that makes Barack Obama's body really skinny and his ears really big, the Aston Martin One-77 makes use of haunches so broad they'd be out of place on a tricked-out version of a Porsche 911 Turbo. The grille seems to be inspired by the Aston Martin DB7 Zagato, one of the ugliest cars of all time.

Yet, the car is distinctly Aston. The One-77's stance is akin to a tiger ready to pounce on an unsuspecting antelope. All four of the 6-spoke wheels are a sight to behold. And the roofline, though similar to the Nissan 370Z's, adds an exotic nature to the classic template.

Besides, the Aston Martin One-77 generates 700 horsepower from its 7.3L V12. Besides, every owner will have the suspension set up specifically for him... or her. Besides, the One-77's glossy carbon fibre tub is apparently "mesmerising". Besides, Aston Martin hung the engine 100mm lower than in any other Aston Martin road car, which is both symbolic of the overall sporting intent and absolutely useful in lowering the centre of gravity.

Take a look at all 15 pictures of the somewhat gorgeous Aston Martin One-77 below.

Monday, April 27, 2009

OFFICIAL GOODCARBADCAR.NET CORONER'S REPORT - PONTIAC DEAD AS A RESULT OF EUTHANASIA


OFFICE OF THE GOODCARBADCAR.NET CORONER

Date & Hour Autopsy Performed: 04.27.2009
FULL AUTOPSY PERFORMED by:
The Good Car Guy
GoodCarBadCar Towers

-----

SUMMARY REPORT OF AUTOPSY

Name: General Motors, Pontiac
Date of Birth: 1926
Date of Death: 2010
Age: 84
Body Identified By: Fritz Henderson, Chief Executive Officer at General Motors
Investigative Agency: GoodCarBadCar.net

-----

EXTERNAL EXAMINATION

The autopsy is begun at 10:53 (AST) on Monday, April 27, of 2009. The body of Pontiac is presented after the death knell has sounded but more than a year in advance of its death. At the time, Pontiac was wearing the Torrent, Solstice, G8, G6, G5, Vibe, and G3. The body is that of a normally developed automotive brand with excess girth as evidenced by the Torrent, G5, and G3. Upon removal of the victim's clothing, an odor of confusion and disarray wafted through the examination room. Strakes, said by witnesses to be called "cladding", were seen up and down the sides of the victim's body. On the front, scoops and gills appear to show signs of being present for more than 15 years.

INTERNAL EXAMINATION

Head & Central Nervous System: Cruel and unusual punishment was meted out upon Pontiac for more than two decades as punishment for, perhaps, being John Z. DeLorean's favourite brand. Mismanagement at the top resulted in a mismatched product lineup. Like placing an 11-year old soccer player in midfield to play with Ronaldinho, both the youngster and the superstar suffer. Thus, the G3 negatively impacted the G8 while not doing itself any good either.

Skeletal System: A General Motors product revival, as seen in the G8 and even the Torrent GXP as well as in other linked-up families like Chevrolet (Malibu), Cadillac (CTS) and Buick (Enclave), shows core strength deep down in the foundation.

Respiratory System: Automotive brands need $$$ to breathe easy. Pontiac's parent, General Motors, was increasingly reliant on government loans to breathe. Pontiac wasn't getting enough of that air.

Cardiovascular System: Even if Pontiac had been breathing easily, the blood only pumps if consumers are purchasing in large numbers. In the United States this past January for example, Pontiac sales were 62% lower than in the same period of the year before. The blood was not pumping.

Gastrointestinal System: Not only recently but in the distant past, Pontiac was not being fed the same way as other General Motors brands. For instance, despite Pontiac's image as GM's performance brand, it was Chevrolet's Cobalt that received the SS treatment with all its horsepower and suspension trickery while the identical car at Pontiac, the G5, starved with 150 horsepower whether you wanted more or not. In other instances, too much gas could be a problem. The G8 GXP, a terrific car introduced at the wrong time, suffered from a guzzling mentality that results in using a gallon of gasoline every 13 miles in city driving. Besides all that, indigestion still lingers after trying to swallow the guilt and shame otherwise known as the Aztek.

LABORATORY DATA

Excessive steel and iron. Low in gold, silver, and bronze. No potential for hydrogen or diesel. Thankfully, no neon was ever present. Lacking aluminum and titanium. Bilirubin count was normal.

EVIDENCE COLLECTED

Witnesses say the parent, General Motors, has plans to cut the number of nameplates offered in North America from last year's 47 to 34 by the end of 2010. Apparently, the sibling which helped Pontiac the most, Holden, will lose $1,000,000,000 per year as a result of Pontiac's demise. General Motors also plans to save $2,600,000,000 in hourly labour costs by 2010. Also, General Motors has come to grips with the fact that their market share in the USA will likely drop from 19.5 to 18.5 in the near future. GM's market share in the late 1960s was about half of all vehicles sold in America.

-----

OPINION

Time of Death: 12.01.2010 at the latest

Immediate Cause of Death: Dwindling sales, uninteresting lineup/uninterested public, only enough $$$ to support four General Motors brands (Chevrolet, Cadillac, Buick, GMC)

Manner of Death: Euthanasia

Remarks: General Motors bigshots like Bob Lutz and Rick Wagoner wanted Pontiac to be America's BMW. After that decision was made, the public was offered a renewed Grand Prix as well as the G6. One wonders, had General Motors decided a decade or more in the past that Pontiac would be America's Porsche, if cars like the Solstice, G8, and the new Camaro-as-a-Trans Am would have resulted in the niche brand GM said they wanted a few months ago. Pontiac's history is either ignored, dismissed, forgotten, or not known by the vast majority of 2009's auto-buying public. Still, attempting to sell excitement and then providing North America with the G3 and G5 was - and will always be remembered as - a big mistake. Indeed, Pontiac's history necessitated a product lineup that: provided a refined Solstice; made the Camaro a Pontiac and not a Chevrolet; made use of the CTS-v Coupe's underpinnings as a modern-day GTO; could turn the Volt into GM's first performance-oriented hybrid; and sold the G8 GT and G8 GXP as an alternative to a similar car that was available at Buick with a V6 only.