Halfway through its time at GCBC Towers, our 2009 smart fortwo pure is struggling to convince us of its long-term viability. The latest quality concern isn't even completely the car's fault, but the fact that the car could be broken so easily is quite surprising. We'll get to that in a moment.
Back in November, the blower stopped blowing. Unable to defrost the windows or warm up the interior, the 2009 smart fortwo spent over six hours in the shop at O'Regan's Mercedes-Benz where a new blower was installed under warranty.
In September, the blinker stalk lost its end cap for no apparent reason. Without being a Mercedes-Benz parts manager, you'd think this is a truly obscure part, would you not? You'd be right, partially. Though the part wasn't in stock, the problem was described by service representatives as one that happens frequently when the smart's plastic bits undergo constant contact. Well, perhaps the signal device should be designed with the possibility of constant use in mind. This was another warranty repair.
Then there were/are problems with the steering wheel. The material started to peel away at the top of the wheel in November. Before we could find an appropriate, clear adhesive to paste the offending leftovers back into the groove, they'd come undone. Fortunately, it takes a keen eye to spot the faint damage. More serious, and far more annoying, is the steering wheel's newfound creaking and squeaking when slowly turning to the right at low speeds. It's enough to drive you around the bend.
Get it? It squeaks when turning around corners slowly, and it'll "drive you around the bend"?
Anyway, if yesterday's problem didn't come at such an inopportune time - it was the end of the day and I had to be downtown fast - we'd have asked the dealer to inspect the wheel yesterday. Surely the noise is still being made at higher speeds, but extra wind and engine noise makes it impossible to hear. Turning into parking spots or rolling away from four-way stops, the wheel's noises aren't unlike that of fingernails on chalkboards.
Now to yesterday's issue. Although unknown to us for the nearly 18 months in which the 2009 smart fortwo has been in our possession, although never creeping up in the previous 58 trips to gas stations, it was discovered yesterday at a Shell station in Halifax, Nova Scotia, that the smart fortwo has a locking gas cap cover. If the car is locked, so is the gas cap cover. There's no visible lock. The cover still has plenty of give in its range of motion. Indeed, the car's manual describes the locking mechanism as one which includes the fuel filler flap, but who reads the section on how to unlock your car? Not The Good Car Guy.
Anyway, this had to have been the first time I locked the car after getting out; before opening the fuel filler flap. (A subliminal exercise because I was on Robie and North instead of the safe confines at Lacewood and Parkland?) Yep, it was locked. The plastic was cold, but not that cold. It was 0ÂșC. The fuel filler flap came off in my hand. In my somewhat disturbed state, I dropped it to the ground like it was a poisonous lead-filled piece of black plastic. (It may also have been dropped suddenly because it was covered in salty winter grime.) There were two problems which immediately came to mind. The fuel door wasn't open - I still couldn't get to the gas cap, so I couldn't fill up the car with Shell V-Power. (It was locked, remember, and I didn't know that it even could lock.) Also, the flappy piece of the door was on the ground.
I gave one tug at what remained of the fuel door which, of course, would not budge. I put the fuel filler flap in the car and drove 1 kilometre to the Mercedes-Benz dealer. They diagnosed the problem as a piece of brittle plastic being tugged when locked. They placed a new fuel filler flap off a brand new 2011 smart fortwo, not having the part in stock, where the missing part was.... er, missing, for $35.25 including tax. On my merry way I went.
Here's the good news. The new fuel filler flap looks great, it's cleaner than the original piece had been in months. The service representative was a friendly fellow who shared the news that I wasn't even the first to do this today. A gent checking out a pre-owned Volvo tore the fuel filler flap off earlier that morning and the Volvo dealer had four in stock.
The bad news? If the fuel filler flap is going to be locked, why does it have an inch of travel even when locked? This isn't just true of the one I demolished with two grams of force; the new one has the sort of built in give you'd expect in the steering of a 1980 Cadillac Eldorado. It's appalling.
Our smart car has averaged 6.6 L/100km since the end of September. That's 35.6 miles per gallon in America, 42.8 miles per gallon in the United Kingdom. As always, most driving is done in the city but there are some highway spurts in there. One specific fill-up required just 4.9 litres per 100 kilometres. That's still not quite as good as what the Canadian government says you'll get on the highway but it's seven miles per gallon better than what the EPA says smarts will acheive on the highway, a 17% improvement on that figure if my math's right. Overall, with just under 21,000 kilometres on the 2009 smart (over 13,000 miles), we're averaging 6.38 L/100km. That's 36.8 miles per gallon, slightly better than the EPA's 36 mpg average.
The smart fortwo isn't for everyone. As the theory goes, it's perfect for certain someones. But with quality concerns, albeit minor ones, creeping up on a relatively routine basis, the smart fortwo is increasingly looking like it may go from recommended for certain someones to unrecommended for certain everyones.
Related From GoodCarBadCar.net
Smart Fortwo Blower Not Blowing
Official Scion iQ Fuel Economy Ratings
Blinker Plastic Busted On Long-Term Smart Fortwo
750 Kilometres In 18 Hours To Cape Breton And Back In A Smart Car
Showing posts with label One Year With The Smart. Show all posts
Showing posts with label One Year With The Smart. Show all posts
Friday, December 31, 2010
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
ONE YEAR WITH THE SMART FORTWO - INSURING THE SMART FOR A SECOND YEAR
On the last day of June The Good Car Guy began looking back at One Year With The Smart. Then a couple weeks later, a complete rundown of Numbers was generated. For the first time in its brief existence, GoodCarBadCar.net has hosted a long-term test car. Reviewing a 2009 smart fortwo pure for one year has produced some interesting revelations, some impressive statistics, and a whole lot of contentedness. Now to top things off, an auto insurance anecdote.
-----
Ranking the worst parts of buying a new car is a really difficult task. There's the meeting with the Business Manager who wants to, or is supposed to, sell you all sorts of add-ons. Before that comes the chequing account and spreadsheet perusal - can you really afford that car? There's the agony over colour choices: dealerships frequently don't have the car you want in the colour you want. You might have to wait a couple days.
Finally, you've got to finalize your automotive insurance. Eek.
The team behind GoodCarBadCar.net is small. At any one time you're unlikely to find more than two people inside GCBC Towers. The Good Car Girl has never been stopped by police. True, the story is different for The Good Car Guy, but not terribly so. There's only one ticket in our joint history, and it's ancient history at that. Failing to obey a traffic sign? He was a nice officer - the sign displayed the speed limit; the cost of the ticket could've been much worse.
So you'd think automotive insurance would be an inexpensive part of GoodCarBadCar.net's livelihood. You'd be wrong. Nova Scotians pay through the nose for auto insurance, although everybody probably feels that way, no matter the province or state.
In year numero uno of the white smart fortwo's stay at GCBC Towers, insurance companies were either rejecting us because of our age or rejecting us in spirit by generating out-of-this-world car insurance quotes. It felt as though almost every insurance company in the city of Halifax had been called or email when, on our last attempt, a quote was given by Dominion Canada - via an insurance salesman in Spryfield - that was 40% lower than any other quote we'd heard.
Better yet, renewal time just came up, and insurance costs for GCBC's long-term smart fortwo dropped again. Clean driving and increased experience led to a 22% cut for 2010-2011. Of course, we made a few calls again to make sure other companies wouldn't look more favourably upon us one year later. Guess what? They wouldn't/didn't/won't.
GoodCarBadCar.net's long-term 2009 smart fortwo pure is an efficient little urban runabout. Considering the low mileage put up by The Good Car Guy, the efficiency of the smart, the free servicing at O'Regan's Mercedes-Benz, and the decreasing cost of automotive insurance, life with our smart car is just getting cheaper and cheaper.
Wednesday, July 14, 2010
ONE YEAR WITH THE SMART FORTWO - BY THE NUMBERS
A couple weeks ago The Good Car Guy began looking back at One Year With The Smart. For the first time in its brief existence, GoodCarBadCar.net has hosted a long-term test car. Reviewing a 2009 smart fortwo pure for one year has produced some interesting revelations, some impressive statistics, and a whole lot of contentedness. This look back continues with a look at the Numbers.
-----
11,499 - kilometres travelled by GoodCarBadCar.net's long-term 2009 smart fortwo in its first year of service with GCBC.
3 - provinces in which GoodCarBadCar.net's long-term smart fortwo has been driven: Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Prince Edward Island.
6.45 - average fuel consumption over the course of one year, measured in litres per 100 kilometres. This is equal to 36.5 miles per gallon (U.S.) or 43.8 miles per gallon (Imperial). The 2009 smart fortwo has a 36 mpg combined rating from the EPA.
5.67 - best fuel consumption achieved between fill-ups of premium gasoline, occuring during gentle driving through Nova Scotia's country roads during an October vacation. 5.67L/100km is equal to 41.5 miles per gallon (U.S.), half an mpg above the EPA's highway rating.
8.8 - worst fuel consumption achieved between fill-ups of premium gasoline, occuring right before the tank on which the best fuel consumption was achieved. That's just 26.7 U.S. mpg. The next-worst was 7.5L/100km, a far more tolerable 31.4 mpg.
12 - people who have inhabited the passenger seat, though not all at the same time.
526.9 - greatest number of kilometres (327.4 miles) shown on the trip meter. The fuel gauge led us to believe there was nothing left despite the fact that a few litres could yet have been sipped. The tank holds 33 litres.
35 - visits to gas stations in Prince Edward Island and Nova Scotia (stops were never required in New Brunswick) during the 52 weeks between July 7/2009 and July 7/ 2010.
0 - CDs, otherwise known as compact discs, inserted into the smart's CD player so far.
1.09 - average price, in Canadian dollars, paid for premium fuel over the last year.
1.155 - highest price, in Canadian dollars, paid for fuel (November 5/2009).
1.056 - lowest price, in Canadian dollars, paid for fuel (July 10/2009 and July 16/2009).
70 - approximate percentage of smart fortwo driving which took place in the city - the real city part of the city - of Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Related From GoodCarBadCar.net
Wednesday, June 30, 2010
ONE YEAR WITH A 2009 SMART FORTWO
Over the next little while The Good Car Guy will periodically look back at One Year With The Smart. For the first time in its brief existence, GoodCarBadCar.net has hosted a long-term test car. Reviewing a 2009 smart fortwo pure for one year has produced some interesting revelations, some impressive statistics, and a whole lot of contentedness. We'll start with a general recap.
-----
With tastes as varied as an Italian seafood eggroll served in a New Jersey Thai restauraunt with a side of grits and foie gras, the GoodCarBadCar.net team had a lot of options when it came time to choose its first long-term test car. There was talk of jumbo SUVs, minivans and, as you've concluded, a Mercedes-Benz developed city car called the smart fortwo.
Picked up at O'Regan's Mercedes-Benz in Halifax, Nova Scotia, our 2009 smart fortwo was kitted out in pure trim with just one option: air conditioning. Standard equipment included power windows and locks with keyless entry, a cornucopia of safety equipment (ABS and stability control most importantly), two ridiculously powerful headlights, and a fantastic little 2-speaker stereo with an auxiliary jack in the glovebox. Our smart fortwo is Crystal White with a tridion safety cell in black.
Last July, Mercedes-Benz Canada was offering a Mobility Rebate of $2,000 right off the bat for every smart fortwo. That took the smart fortwo pure's base price from $14,990 to $12,990. The charge for air-con was $850 for a grand total of $13,840 before delivery. At that time smart was also throwing in free maintenance for 3 years/54,000 kilometres, the amount of time the smart car was going to be in our care. For the record, smart Canada's new car warranty is 4 years/80,000 km.
GoodCarBadCar.net's Driven review of the smart fortwo offers up a thorough version of what it's like to actually drive the car. In this space then, an exhaustive detailed account isn't necessary. You should note, however, that the kind of driving we do around these parts is almost completely of the city variety. This resulted in almost always desiring to be back in the smart fortwo after a day or two in anything else. Of course, for a road trip across the continent, a Subaru Outback or Toyota Camry or Ford Taurus SEL would be preferable. But after a little bit of time careening through the city of Halifax in the aforementioned Outback, Camry, or Taurus, the smart car felt right and proper; efficient and intelligently designed.
A short while after acquiring the smart car, The Good Car Guy laid out the Top 5 Facts After One Month With A Smart Fortwo. Not long after that, GoodCarBadCar.net covered the Top 5 Bad Smart Fortwo Facts. Of those five bad facts, only the #1 complaint has worsened or garnered any genuinely aggravated responses. It had only been two months when first described, but the smart had developed some squeaks and rattles. For the most part, the squeaks and rattles haven't worsened. The sun visors buzz against the headliner when the weather is humid - that hasn't changed - but a good whack of the visor against the roof temporarily cures the problem anyway. Thankfully, the driver's seatbelt no longer yelps. Yet recently the passenger seat began babbling like a pebble-bottomed brook. It only happens when a passenger is present; it worsens with the weight of respective passengers; it can't be sourced; and it drives everyone crazy on washboard roads. This problem is less than a month old and hasn't been discussed with a a service representative at O'Regan's Mercedes-Benz.
Speaking of service, there's only been the one. It went by smooth as silk and was free as a bird. Get the full rundown at Fuel The Smart. Speaking of Fuel The Smart....
Every kilometre this smart has driven has been tracked. No, not by the CIA; not even by CSIS. We're talking about The Good Car Guy's absolute addiction to tracking real-world fuel economy statistics. Fuel The Smart has played host to a thorough examination of every single trip to a gas station in the last year. Averaging 6.4L/100 kilometres, 36.8 miles per gallon on the U.S. scale, or 44.1 miles per gallon for the Imperial gang, GoodCarBadCar.net's smart fortwo easily conquered the EPA's combined rating of 36 miles per gallon. The EPA rates the 2009 smart fortwo as a 33 mpg car in city driving, 41 mpg on the highway. Our smart fortwo has only dropped below the 33 mpg barrier six times out of 34 fill-ups. On the other hand, we've only topped 41 miles per gallon once, on a 494.4 kilometre journey across Prince Edward Island. What's been disappointing is the wildly high fuel economy ratings provided by Natural Resources Canada and our inability to get anywhere near 4.8L/100km on the highway. That's equal to 49 miles per U.S. gallon.
The most easily conceived notion after a year with a 2009 smart fortwo pure? Well, the Honda Fit was one similarly-priced candidate for the job last July. With air-conditioning, the Fit is priced at $15,780. An automatic transmission would take that up to $16,980, about $3,000 more than the smart. Sure, you get more seats and more space. But what if you don't need more seats or more space? Why would you pay an extra $3,000 before the fuel economy advantages and free maintenance are even taken into account for something you don't need? Besides, the Honda doesn't even have power locks or keyless entry or stability control at that price. Therein lies the great thing about requiring little: smart offers a little bit of car for a little bit of money with a lot of equipment, tremendous comfort inside, and the most wonderfully simplistic city driving nature known to North America at this time.
The 1.0L 3-cylinder sounds a bit like a Porsche 911. We park the car wherever we want, and rather easily at that. We've been down rugged dirt roads in the country, driven extensively on snow-covered roads with a rear-engined rear-wheel drive car and all-season tires, and done it all quite cheaply. If GoodCarBadCar.net's smart could talk, it would say, "More please".
Related From GoodCarBadCar.net
One Year With The Smart Fortwo - Numbers
2009 Smart Fortwo Pure Driven
Smart Fortwo Car Wash Photography
Top 5 Bad Smart Fortwo Facts
Top 5 Facts After 1 Month With A Smart Fortwo
Smart Fortwo 3 To Beat
The Good 12 v3.0 Part X - Smart Fortwo
Pounds Per Horsespower, Smart vs Other Small Cars
Smart Fortwo - Replacing Our Long-Termer Across The Pond
Fuel The Smart - Every Fill-Up Analyzed
-----
With tastes as varied as an Italian seafood eggroll served in a New Jersey Thai restauraunt with a side of grits and foie gras, the GoodCarBadCar.net team had a lot of options when it came time to choose its first long-term test car. There was talk of jumbo SUVs, minivans and, as you've concluded, a Mercedes-Benz developed city car called the smart fortwo.
Picked up at O'Regan's Mercedes-Benz in Halifax, Nova Scotia, our 2009 smart fortwo was kitted out in pure trim with just one option: air conditioning. Standard equipment included power windows and locks with keyless entry, a cornucopia of safety equipment (ABS and stability control most importantly), two ridiculously powerful headlights, and a fantastic little 2-speaker stereo with an auxiliary jack in the glovebox. Our smart fortwo is Crystal White with a tridion safety cell in black.
Last July, Mercedes-Benz Canada was offering a Mobility Rebate of $2,000 right off the bat for every smart fortwo. That took the smart fortwo pure's base price from $14,990 to $12,990. The charge for air-con was $850 for a grand total of $13,840 before delivery. At that time smart was also throwing in free maintenance for 3 years/54,000 kilometres, the amount of time the smart car was going to be in our care. For the record, smart Canada's new car warranty is 4 years/80,000 km.
GoodCarBadCar.net's Driven review of the smart fortwo offers up a thorough version of what it's like to actually drive the car. In this space then, an exhaustive detailed account isn't necessary. You should note, however, that the kind of driving we do around these parts is almost completely of the city variety. This resulted in almost always desiring to be back in the smart fortwo after a day or two in anything else. Of course, for a road trip across the continent, a Subaru Outback or Toyota Camry or Ford Taurus SEL would be preferable. But after a little bit of time careening through the city of Halifax in the aforementioned Outback, Camry, or Taurus, the smart car felt right and proper; efficient and intelligently designed.
A short while after acquiring the smart car, The Good Car Guy laid out the Top 5 Facts After One Month With A Smart Fortwo. Not long after that, GoodCarBadCar.net covered the Top 5 Bad Smart Fortwo Facts. Of those five bad facts, only the #1 complaint has worsened or garnered any genuinely aggravated responses. It had only been two months when first described, but the smart had developed some squeaks and rattles. For the most part, the squeaks and rattles haven't worsened. The sun visors buzz against the headliner when the weather is humid - that hasn't changed - but a good whack of the visor against the roof temporarily cures the problem anyway. Thankfully, the driver's seatbelt no longer yelps. Yet recently the passenger seat began babbling like a pebble-bottomed brook. It only happens when a passenger is present; it worsens with the weight of respective passengers; it can't be sourced; and it drives everyone crazy on washboard roads. This problem is less than a month old and hasn't been discussed with a a service representative at O'Regan's Mercedes-Benz.
Speaking of service, there's only been the one. It went by smooth as silk and was free as a bird. Get the full rundown at Fuel The Smart. Speaking of Fuel The Smart....
Every kilometre this smart has driven has been tracked. No, not by the CIA; not even by CSIS. We're talking about The Good Car Guy's absolute addiction to tracking real-world fuel economy statistics. Fuel The Smart has played host to a thorough examination of every single trip to a gas station in the last year. Averaging 6.4L/100 kilometres, 36.8 miles per gallon on the U.S. scale, or 44.1 miles per gallon for the Imperial gang, GoodCarBadCar.net's smart fortwo easily conquered the EPA's combined rating of 36 miles per gallon. The EPA rates the 2009 smart fortwo as a 33 mpg car in city driving, 41 mpg on the highway. Our smart fortwo has only dropped below the 33 mpg barrier six times out of 34 fill-ups. On the other hand, we've only topped 41 miles per gallon once, on a 494.4 kilometre journey across Prince Edward Island. What's been disappointing is the wildly high fuel economy ratings provided by Natural Resources Canada and our inability to get anywhere near 4.8L/100km on the highway. That's equal to 49 miles per U.S. gallon.
The most easily conceived notion after a year with a 2009 smart fortwo pure? Well, the Honda Fit was one similarly-priced candidate for the job last July. With air-conditioning, the Fit is priced at $15,780. An automatic transmission would take that up to $16,980, about $3,000 more than the smart. Sure, you get more seats and more space. But what if you don't need more seats or more space? Why would you pay an extra $3,000 before the fuel economy advantages and free maintenance are even taken into account for something you don't need? Besides, the Honda doesn't even have power locks or keyless entry or stability control at that price. Therein lies the great thing about requiring little: smart offers a little bit of car for a little bit of money with a lot of equipment, tremendous comfort inside, and the most wonderfully simplistic city driving nature known to North America at this time.
The 1.0L 3-cylinder sounds a bit like a Porsche 911. We park the car wherever we want, and rather easily at that. We've been down rugged dirt roads in the country, driven extensively on snow-covered roads with a rear-engined rear-wheel drive car and all-season tires, and done it all quite cheaply. If GoodCarBadCar.net's smart could talk, it would say, "More please".
Related From GoodCarBadCar.net
One Year With The Smart Fortwo - Numbers
2009 Smart Fortwo Pure Driven
Smart Fortwo Car Wash Photography
Top 5 Bad Smart Fortwo Facts
Top 5 Facts After 1 Month With A Smart Fortwo
Smart Fortwo 3 To Beat
The Good 12 v3.0 Part X - Smart Fortwo
Pounds Per Horsespower, Smart vs Other Small Cars
Smart Fortwo - Replacing Our Long-Termer Across The Pond
Fuel The Smart - Every Fill-Up Analyzed
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

