Nah, the BMW X6 ActiveHybrid weighs 5,741 pounds. As a result of way too much girth and way too much engine, a hybrid was the least efficient product in C/D's August 2010 issue.
The Good Car Guy has never been a fan of the BMW X6. Placing it in The Bad 8 Supersize and The Bad 8 Supersize v2.0 was a sign of that. But the X6 ActiveHybrid is the likely victor of 2010's The Worst New Vehicle Of The Year competition. Compare, for example, the dreadfully-named X6 xDrive35i and the X6 ActiveHybrid. The hybrid BMW doesn't improve the 35i's city fuel economy rating of 17 mpg but is 6 mpg worse on the highway. Now let's look at the BMw X6 xDrive 50i. Again, highway fuel economy is worse in the hybrid, although the 50i's city rating is 3 mpg below the hybrid's. Then there's the obscene X6 M. The M has an EPA combined rating of 14 miles per gallon, identical to the real-world figure achieved by Car & Driver with the X6 ActiveHybrid. Inefficient, ugly, and useless: the BMW X6 ActiveHybrid.
11 other vehicles underwent fuel economy testing with C/D for the August issue. There results are below.
-----
Mitsubishi i AWD 659cc: 39 miles per gallon
Ford Fiesta SEL: 29 miles per gallon
Suzuki Kizashi GTS: 25 miles per gallon (over 5,163 miles)
Audi A6 3.0T: 22 miles per gallon
BMW 535i: 22 miles per gallon
Hyundai Genesis 4.6: 21 miles per gallon (over 40,000 miles)
Infiniti M37: 20 miles per gallon
BMW 750Li xDrive: 17 miles per gallon (over 14,263 miles)
Ford Shelby GT500: 15 miles per gallon
Aston Martin Rapide: 15 miles per gallon
Porsche Panamera Turbo: 15 miles per gallon
BMW X6 ActiveHybrid: 14 miles per gallon
Related From GoodCarBadCar.net
0-60 In Car & Driver August 2010
Fuel Economy In Car & Driver July 2010
Fuel Economy In Car &Driver June 2010
Mitsubishi i MiEV Police Car
No comments:
Post a Comment