However, at one time, the Chevrolet Impala and Chevrolet Malibu were hot cars.... when I was -20 years old. So the questions I ask must be valid. Is it sensible to draw on names which possessed greatness 30 or more years ago? Is it smart to assume that your sales wil
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0ca4/f0ca4f30a47cc873ed6e791769a50989d56a99cf" alt=""
And if that name is so great, why did you ever stop using it? Aha, because it began to lose value. And you, GM and others, are hoping with all your hearts that people will forget the bad days of the model and only remember the good days. So with some of us, you neither gain or lose nothing.
We don't rememb
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12930/12930f7a44f430eb8fdaf52b74737b69d5553355" alt=""
Oh no. Don't do it. This move sends out shock waves of desperation from every corner of the Ford epicentre. Firstly, the Five Hundred wasn't good enough to sell as good product, so hopefully we will trick people into thinking it is a completely different car. Well, ya didn't trick me, Mulally.
Secondly, the Taurus was somewhat revolutionary when it arrived on the scene, lest we forget. Titled the best-selling car in the mid 90's. "But," someone must have asked, "if we banished the name once because it had lost its merit, how did it regain its status in the Ford pantheon?"
Whoever that hypothetical person who hopefully asked that question was received no answer. Apparently, the Ford Five Hundred will become the Ford Taurus because the Taurus has better name recognition. The most unfortunate shock wave of all is the simple fact that nobody recognizes that switching the name of a car midway through its lifespan is just so dirty. Unclean, yucky. It makes the Five Hundred look so pitiful and it forces the Taurus name to flaunt itself as an EMT that won't be able to resuscitate the patient.
Other offenses include the banishing of a good name, but in most cases that has not been a tremendously painful experience for the carmaker involved. But Integra, must we have lost Integra?
No comments:
Post a Comment