Monday, June 30, 2008

CHEVRON CEO ON CNN'S LKL 2NITE

Choosing not to stand idly by as oil companies rake in profits vastly exceeding what was deemed possible just ten years ago ($18,670,000,000 net income last year for Chevron), consumers the world over are protesting. One German man lit a BMW on fire to make his point. Truckers... er, lorry drivers, have parked in England in order to manifest their personal difficulties.

What does Larry King do? He brings David O'Reilly to his desk tonight on CNN (9 eastern, 10 atlantic). As the promo says, "Larry goes straight to the top for the answer. The Chairman and CEO of Chevron explains why fuel prices are through the roof and how the coming months could cost you!"

Choosing to stand in ignorance as commodity traders speculate and oil companies run a business, Larry will probably ask questions meant to irritate O'Reilly and discover - poof! - out of thin air; that the so-called "Big Oil" is in partnership with General Motors and Ford and Chrysler and that we're stuck in a vicious circle necessitating great expense on our part at the pumps with "inefficient" vehicles.

Nah, Larry's smarter than that. People will want those questions asked, and Chevron's boss will likely feel defensive on that front. Regardless, it'll be worth watching. 

MOTOR TREND'S MIDSIZE SEDAN SUMMARIES

Surprised that the most expensive and most expensive to fuel sedan won first place in Motor Trend's comparison of the Honda Accord, Hyundai Sonata, Toyota Camry, Ford Fusion, and Volkswagen Passat? $29,333 ought to beat $22,235, shouldn't it? But in a test where fuel econony matters matter, does the $29,333 car with 22.8mpg on premium gas beat the $22,235 with 23.8 on regular? Well, it does if 0-60 flies by in 6.7 seconds. Here are MT's verdicts with a 1-10 rating from The Good Car Guy, with 10 being complete agreement and 1 being complete disagreement: 

1st Place: Volkswagen Passat - 
Despite a high sticker and thirst for premium, wins by a nose due to driving fun. 
GCBC Agreement: 5

2nd Place: Hyundai Sonata - 
Only lacking the VW's verve; our #1 pick if family comes first.
GCBC Agreement: 7

3rd Place: Toyota Camry - 
Efficient, well executed, it's the sound, yet charmless choice.
GCBC Agreement: 7

4th Place: Honda Accord -
Polarizing looks inside and out can't hide a great engine and chassis combination.
GCBC Agreement: 3

5th Place: Ford Fusion -
Surprisingly athletic chassis hampered by wheezy engine and irritating transmission.
GCBC Agreement: 6

6th Place: Kia Optima -
Though due for a refresh, Kia finishes on top of the second tier. Room and economy are fine, it just needs the same refinements the Sonata received.
GCBC Agreement: 8

7th Place: Nissan Altima -
Steepest sticker, yet not the best ride, performance, or value. CVT and light steering create an effortless drive, yet fully loaded, it still seems lacking.
GCBC Agreement: 9

8th Place: Chevrolet Malibu -
Poor finish for arguably the best looker. Shame that sexy skin hides a weight problem the underpowered Ecotec can't handle.
GCBC Agreement: 6

9th Place: Mitsubishi Galant -
Looks old, feels older, and saddled with many of this comparo's worsts, including power-to-weight and EPA and observed fuel economy.
GCBC Agreement: 10

10th Place: Dodge Avenger -
Drum brakes, four-speed trans, cheap plastics, and poor economy make this a frightful drive. Gaps between last and first don't get any wider than this.
GCBC Agreement: 10

Which cars were missing from the test? Former losers and models soon-to-be replaced. The Subaru Legacy could've finished mid-pack. Mazda's upcoming 6 will charge to the top of the field. Pontiac's G6 would compete with the Galant and Avenger (or Chrysler Sebring) for rear guards. The Saturn Aura is commonly regarded as a lesser Malibu. Check back tomorrow for more detail on MT's controversial winner.
Sunday, June 29, 2008

PASSAT BEATS ACCORD, CAMRY, & SONATA?

0-60 showed earlier this week that Volkswagen's Passat 2.0L Turbo is much quicker than its 4-cylinder competitors. Motor Trend responded favourably to the VW's speed, handing first place in a 10-car comparison test to the turbocharged Passat. Here's the Passat in motion - check back for more details about the test tomorrow and on Canada Day.

Saturday, June 28, 2008

GENERAL MOTORS' LAMBDA CUV OPTIONS

This, my friends, is an unofficial declaration of General Motors' new slogan, in addition to admitting its Barack Obama-derivation: "Crossover Options You Can Believe In". GM certainly believes in Lambda.

Lambda isn't just the 11th letter in the Greek alphabet. GM has taken that letter and applied it to their midsize crossover platform. This platform/architecture/foundation has found its way under four vehicles. GM has options. Believe it.

To keep it brief, The Good Car Guy is going to reign in his wordiness to one sentence per vehicle. Add their manufacturer links and MSRPs from the American market. Although suitably differentiated, these four CUVs are identical under the skin. It's difficult to rank the quartet in terms of anything but personal preference. 

BUICK ENCLAVE: Stunningly beautiful but its heaviness (obviously similar to the other three) leads to a fuel guzzling nature which, when combined with its expense, makes the Enclave an expensive proposition for the latter part of this decade.  $33,995 - $38,190 - Buick.com/Enclave

CHEVROLET TRAVERSE: Its recently revealed price proves to be the value Lambda leader; already possessing the mass-market appeal that Chevrolet produces automatically in addition to more power than its mates. $28,990 - $32,995(GCBC est.) - Chevrolet.com/Traverse

GMC ACADIA: "Professional Grade" advertising seems silly when applied to a vehicle, however tough, that is so truly similar to a Buick and Saturn; though the GMC brand as a whole seems somewhat lacking in an anit-truck buying year. $30,470 - $39,015 - GMC.com/Acadia  

SATURN OUTLOOK: Ask why if you like, but GM is sticking with this import-fighter; leading you to also ask if the other three Lambdas are intended to battle only the Dodge Journey and Ford Edge. $29,360 - $33,370 - Saturn.com/Outlook

Friday, June 27, 2008

CORVETTE ZR1 IS FASTER THAN NISSAN GT-R AFTER ALL?

GoodCarBadCar.net's Good Car Guy was one of many who reported on the approximate laptime of the Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 back in early May. It was known by then that Nissan's remarkable GT-R could loop the Nurburgring in 7:29. Unfortunately for 'Vette engineers, their second digit was a 3. Uh-oh.


Hadn't the chief engineer suggested that his baby, the 638bhp ZR1, would outlap any production car on any track? Was this embarrassing; or purely just another underestimator of the Nissan GT-R? 

Neither. Now that the Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 has had a proper lap around the Nurburgring, General Motors can reveal its might. 

7:26.4 sounds niiice. We await the Nissan GT-R Spec V to watch the 7:26.4 time fall by the wayside.

DODGE HEMI GAINS

345 becomes 390. 375 switches to 407. 

Can you guess what those figures are representing? It's not miles per tank nor are the numbers applicable to the growing monthly payments you'll face next time you buy a new car.

Nope. The first jump of 45 belongs in the horsepower column. Obviously, the second 32 bump is strictly torque.

For what? Dodge and Ford are both introducing new trucks soon. Despite stumbling (free-falling?) sales for trucks overall and most famously for Ford, Dodge and Chevrolet and GMC are all succumbing to consumer dread about fuel prices.

It's not as though trucks are inexpensive vehicles these days. For too long marketed as vehicles just as well-equipped and comfortable as cars; and for too long snapped up like iPods on a 50% off sale, trucks rapidly became the profit source at domestic manufacturers. Now that buyers are heading elsewhere just as Dodge and Ford bring new trucks to dealers (Ford is delaying), what does Dodge do with its 5.7L Hemi engine found under the hood of the Ram?

Make it more powerful. 345 horsepower no more; the Hemi now pumps out 390 caballos. Always a torquey truck, the Hemi-powered Ram churns away to generate 407 lb-ft of twist for 2009. This all sounds great.... right? But... umm, doesn't power come at some expense?

Indeed, Dodge has negated the foregone conclusion. Fuel economy is actually up - only slightly, though. What was 13mpg in the city and 19mpg on the highway will, by Chrysler's estimate, be bumped up 4%. Thus, don't expect anything greater than 14/20mpg. 


However attractive the proposition of a 2-door, 2-wheel drive with a short bed and a Hemi may be, providing 0-60mph times under six seconds, consumers will be expecting to see more than 4% gains in fuel economy on vehicles they're already not buying because of inefficient consumption. 

Do science and engineering lend themselves to such simplified notions as this: that an already powerful truck could have been left as justifiably juicy while making greater gains in the fuel lines? Apparently Chrysler and Dodge don't care to find out.
Thursday, June 26, 2008

MITSUBISHI GALANT RECALL

In the midst of Mitsubishi's greatest recent struggles, some Galants were built with shoddy ignitions. Now NHTSA has issued a Recall. From model years 2004-2005, Mitsubishi built 73,000 iterations of the Galant that could potentially suffer from a malady where, as NHTSA says, "the ignition key interlock cable (which is a component of the interlock system) may allow the interlocking cam to fall forward and allow the ignition key to be removed from the ignition switch when the gearshift mechanism is not in the park position." 

Consequences are obvious. Assume the driver does not shift into park before the key is removed and the parking brake isn't on. Car rolls. Into tree. Damage. Frustration. Expense. 

This Mitsu Galant recall begins in August.

HYUNDAI SANTA FE RECALL

Potentially 88,943 of Hyundai's excellent Santa Fe, a vehicle that once captured a Top 5 title here at GoodCarBadCar.net, are facing a recall. The Santa Fe from model years 2007 and 2008, when purchased with the 18" wheels are the vehicles affected. 

NHTSA's statement includes this summary: "The black certification label affixed to the driver's side center pillar, incorrectly lists the gross axle weight ratings (GAWR).

It may sound silly, but the consequences are more serious. "Overloading your vehicle may adversely affect handling and braking and may cause tire damage, resulting in tire failure and a crash without warning." 

Then again, the "fix" is humorous. "Hyundai will mail corrected certification labels along with the instructions to the affected owners. The customer will have the option for dealers to install the label free of charge."

This Hyundai Santa Fe Recall begins in August.

'09 MERCEDES-BENZ A & B CLASS - Retouched

To what degree will luxury automakers strike at the new North American consumer fear of high fuel prices? BMW is attempting to make the case that they understand high fuel prices being European-based. Audi, Mercedes-Benz, and BMW all have diesel plans; much of which surrounds current vehicles or their direct replacements.

As time moves on, will a move toward smaller vehicles be mandatory? The automakers own fear of devaluing their brand image has motivated BMW to introduce a much better sub-3 Series car. Mercedes-Benz's struggles with the previous C-class coupe is keeping it away from this continent. And, from what we hear, the German trio emphasizes new-technology (hydrogen, hybrid, and turbodiesels) far more than downsizing.

Yet downsizing is the natural answer to alleviating the pain customers feel at the pump. Understandably, the German trio could be rightfully scared of Americans historical tendency to pay by the square foot. Only the small-but-premium Mini Cooper and, to a certain extent, the smart fortwo have challenged that practice. Thus, the advent of the Mercedes-Benz A-class quite a few years ago and the Mercedes-Benz B-class (already on sale in Canada) don't strike the automakers as obvious candidates for the American marketplace. 

Luxurious? Sure. But how luxurious can a small 4-cylinder car really be? These are questions Americans have always responded with when faced by the thought of a tiny luxury car. Will that story begin to change as fuel heads towards $5.00/gallon? Do Americans want a sub-200bhp, roomy Mercedes when a 268-bhp Honda is in the same financial realm? Will we ever know? Will The Good Car Guy stop asking questions?

Behold the '09 Mercedes-Benz A-Class Coupe and B-Class galleries.



Wednesday, June 25, 2008

RAMPENFEST

Does advertising like this work on you? BMW's use of "guerilla marketing" is the talk of the town... well, at least it's the talk of CNN's American Morning. The 1-series is already being marketed in the mainstream on the basis of its fuel efficiency and 2002tii heritage. Does it matter whether BMW's Rampenfest campaign works or not? After all, production costs were a fraction of the typical cost for a 30-second TV spot. Not only that, but the Rampenfest clip spreads like wildfire - at no charge to BMW. As evidence, I submit its presence right here on GoodCarBadCar.net. 







Tuesday, June 24, 2008

VOLKSWAGEN MEMORIES FROM THE GOOD CAR GIRL

When I was about 9 or 10, I remember standing on our front lawn watching the family car being towed away. I felt like shouting, "No, you can't take that! The Jetta is part of our family!".

It's the only car I remembered our family owning and it had so many memories attached to it. The first eight years of my life were spent to-ing and fro-ing in the little diesel Volkswagen Jetta. We traveled to Charlottetown from Souris at least twice a week. It took us down bumpy red dirt roads to our own private beaches. It carried us to my relatives and friends in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick and beyond!

My mother knew how to pack the trunk to its greatest capacity, and my siblings and I knew how to fill the back seat area to its greatest (or overflowing) capacity. Sometimes there would be my sister, my brother in a car seat, me, our golden retriever, and even her puppies in the back seat! The Jetta had chugged along superbly despite the squabbles that sometime took place in its backseat.

The diesel engine had an amazing ability to lull me to sleep. I loved leaning against the window watching the fields full of lupins fly by and listening to the hum of the engine... and then the next thing I knew, we would be at our next destination.

I felt safe in the little old Jetta - even when it started seeing it's doctor more frequently. It felt solid and secure.

That's why when the tow truck started hauling the old Jetta away, I felt like it was taking a part of my happy life a way - just to be replaced by a boring new Nissan Stanza. I never grew to love that car. I'd still go back to that old diesel Jetta any day.

WHO BUILDS THEM TOUGH? SMALL, THIRSTY, SUVs

Simply put, "truck-based" SUVs are generally perceived to be less economical at the fuel pumps. These days, the worse the vehicle's efficiency; the more likely it is that sales numbers for that vehicle are dwindling. Phrases like "truck-based" or "body-on-frame" or simply "real SUV" stand in stark contrast to increasingly common terms like "crossover" CUV" or "crossover utes". 

Does the perception match reality if applied to the smallest examples of tall-bodied, lofty-drive driving position, usually all-wheel drive vehicles? In a word..... yes. While not necessarily the most fuel efficient or least fuel efficient drivetrain combinations for each vehicle are applied here (many transmission choices make little or no difference these days; sometimes the engine doesn't either), this sampling of vehicles are relatively well known and position themselves as tough or carlike. 


Except for one, that is. Suzuki wants you to think that its Grand Vitara is in between; merging the best of tough with the best of car.  Guess what - the fuel efficiency story agrees with Suzuki, dropping the Grand Vitara in between the tough SUVs and the more car-like CUVs.

-----

Hummer H3 V8 - 14mpg
Jeep Wrangler 6-spd man - 16mpg 
Toyota FJ Cruiser man -16mpg
Nissan Xterra man - 17mpg
Dodge Nitro 4.0L - 17mpg

Suzuki Grand Vitara man - 18mpg

Ford Escape - 19mpg
Hyundai Santa Fe - 19mpg
Kia Sportage - 19mpg
Toyota RAV4 - 21mpg
Honda CR-V - 22mpg
Monday, June 23, 2008

JOE ABUTEL'S WEIRD PRIUS PURCHASE

CNN's Deb Feyerick is covering the story of decreasing 'green' car availability. Joe Abutel is a Manhattan dude that downsized from a Hummer to a Toyota Prius. (No options in between?) Clearly Joe was pretty serious about the environmental impact of the car (something that has been placed in doubt before, remember) and not just the savings at the pump. 


How do ya figure that? Well, Abutel spent nearly $24,000 on the used and slightly damaged hybrid Toyota after spending some $2,400 on fuel last month in his Hummer. The Ford dealer where the Prius had been accepted on trade - indicating somebody wanted something better - had started eBay bidding at $15,000. Not only that, but Joe Abutel was contacted by three other bidders who figured he'd continue the sales chain at slightly above $24,000.

My question: Despite the increasingly hard-to-find car that the Prius is, how does Abutel justify paying more for a used Prius than the upper-level Touring model is when new? Moreover, if downsizing from a Hummer to a more fuel efficient car is necessary - which it probably is - why spend an inordinate amount of cash on the car side of the equation? Put another way - wouldn't 10,000 fewer dollars spent on the vehicle be a handy gas cash pouch? Ya know, the Good 12-winning Honda Fit, for example. 

If efficiency is the genuine objective, a $24,000 Prius isn't the answer to your Hummer problem. Check out the CNN.com video here.
Sunday, June 22, 2008

FRENCH GRAND PRIX RESULTS

Felipe Massa drove his Ferrari to a third victory this season at Magny-Cours in France, pushing him into first place in the drivers standings. Kimi Raikkonen seemed to be in full control until his tailpipe came undone; but managed to take second place in his Ferrari. Ferrari's lead in the team standings was extended to 17 points above BMW.

BMW's drivers, Robert Kubica and Nick Heidfeld, finished 5th and 13th. Kubica now sits just behind Ferrari's Massa in the drivers standings. The third dominant team in Formula 1, McLaren-Mercedes, suffered from numerous problems on this day. Heikki Kovalainen managed a 4th place finish but would assuredly list Jarno Trulli (3rd in a Toyota) as a new nemesis. 

Lewis Hamilton was dropped 10 places on the starting grid because of his pitlane incident with Raikkonen's Ferrari last race in Montreal and added to his troubles by completing an illegal pass on Sebastian Vettel (12th in his Ferrari-powered Toro Rosso) which necessitated a pitlane drive-thru. With Hamilton's Mercedes finishing way back in 10th, the McLaren-Mercedes team collected just the five points by way of their Finnish driver.

The aforementioned Toyota finished the race about 30 seconds ahead of teammate Timo Glock with his 11th place position. The other STR-Ferrari Sebastien, a certain Mr. Bourdais, struggled yet again and finished in 17th. 

Only one car was retired from the race. That'd be Jenson Button in his Honda. The other Honda, Rubens Barichello's car, raced to 14th. Sucky day. Toyota engines found inside the Williams cars of Kaz Nakajima and Nico Rosberg drove to 15th and 16th, respectively. Ferrari powers the Force India cars, but Fisichella and Sutil were unable to replicate their similarly-powered racers at the front of the pack. 18th and 19th for these boys.

Only the Renault engines remain. The factory team, with drivers Fernando Alonso and Nelsinho Piquet, gathered three points from their 7th and 8th spots; Piquet ahead of the two-time world champion. Mark Webber and David Coulthard bookended the "real" Renaults, but only Webber's Red Bull grabbed points.

In two weeks time, the F1 cars head to the Silverstone circuit in Britain. Added pressure for phenom Hamilton - added angst for team principal Ron Dennis. Lewis was a might aggressive at Magny-Cours.
Saturday, June 21, 2008

BMW M3 CONVERTIBLE - en mouvement

BMW's righteous M3 is a known quantity. Walk into your nearest BMW dealer and they'll present you with an M3 trifecta: coupe, sedan, and convertible. Word spreads with each new-gen M3 that BMW's iconic sporting machine is getting too heavy and softening too severely. Yet... the M3 is a constant sales success.

Though it's an obvious criticism to paint any convertible version of a sportscar with poseur terminology, the new M3 droptop has a greater claim to fame than ever. With a metal roof and power retraction, its ability to suck in buyers from Miami to Mission Viejo will be surely enhanced. Soft or not, the BMW M3 convertible is desirable. Check it out in motion for further proof.


Friday, June 20, 2008

REAGAN DIARIES - AUTO PROBLEMS

Long before the term "blog" was invented and the internet had sprung up as the automotive enthusiast's favourite tool, the domestic automobile sector was known to struggle. What's new? With your current daily dose of auto news, test drives, and opinion; the American automakers (General Motors, Ford Motor Company, Chrysler LLC) are yet again suffering from o'erwhelming maladies. 

Fuel prices are rising, just one factor that's driving consumers away from SUVs and trucks. SUVs and trucks are the vehicles by which the American manufacturers made hay over the last 15-20 years. The mortgage crisis possesses long-lasting effects; another reason that the auto market, as a whole, is dwindling. Besides the theorizing, statistics show that, at least in the month of May, the four best-selling vehicles in America wore the badges of Japanese car companies. Alarm. Bells. Ringing.

Is the story new? Yes, it's brand new. Does it reek of 1981? For sure. Not that I would know, being, shall we say.... nonexistent.

However, the recent publishing of Ronald Reagan's diaries (The Reagan Diaries - Edited by Douglas Brinkley - HarperCollins) reveals the former president's feelings about the struggles of America's own automobile companies in the early 80's. From Thursday, March 19/1981:

"The auto task force met with Cabinet - still some disagreement about any quotas on Japanese imports. Some even with regard to a Japanese voluntary cutback. The V.P. summed it up nicely. He said we're all for free enterprise but would any of us find fault if Japan announced without any request from us that they were going to reduce their export of autos to America?

There was no dissent. I told them I'd heard enough I would make a decision. Privately I told Al Haig (Secretary of State) to call Amb. Mike Mansfield (Japan) and have Mike advise "Ito" before his visit that we were threatened by a bill in Cong. to set a quota. An announcement by Japan of a voluntary cutback could head that off. We'll see what happens.

Al then told me he felt he was being undercut by other agencies etc. I worry that he has something of a complex about this. Anyway I've arranged that he & I meet privately 3x a week."

From Friday, December 18th/1981:

"Most important meeting with heads of Auto Co's. That industry is facing total disaster. I'm recommending that we tell Japan we are going to impose same restrictions on their exports as they do on import of Am. cars in Japan. Auto makers need passage of Clean Air Act changes which can reduce price of Am. cars."

From Tuesday, August 10/1982: 

"Met with Chryslers Lee Iacocca. He's all for our program and wants to help. He has reduced Chryslers cost of production 50%. No wonder they show a profit." 

From Sunday, January 16/1983:

"Spent most of the day at desk, then at 6:30 guests arrived for a stag-bull session dinner. Geo. Shultz, Geo. Bush, Bryce Harlow, Lee Iacocca, Geo. Will and Irving Kristol. Most of the conversation centered around the auto industry. Lee discussed the Japanese problem & their restrictive trade practices, including under valuing the Yen. It was most informative & useful since we'll be dealing with P.M. Nakasone Tues."

From Wednesday, April 11/1984:

"Off to Kansas City to visit a Ford plant & speak to 2000 workers. I was warmly received inspite of the best efforts of the Auto workers union. To see I wouldn't be. They are doing a remarkable job of making a worker management team at that plant which probably drives the Union leaders up the wall. "
Thursday, June 19, 2008

SUBARU'S ADVERTISING

Subaru, one of Asia's more unique automakers, has taken an equally odd and hilarious approach to marketing its Forester cute-ute in Canada. Matching sumo wrestlers with the all-new small Subie wouldn't generally invoke cries of "Sexy", but Fuji Heavy Industries has executed good and well.

Follow this link to SexySubaru.ca where you can control your own photoshoot with a rather large gentleman and a Subaru Forester. Zoom in, move left and right, and alter the finish of your shots at the end. YouTube'll show you the main TV advert, as well.

CHEVROLET VOLT - Early Numbers

Although unable to testify to the impact the Chevrolet Volt is having on behalf of General Motors outside of North America, it is garnering plenty of attention on this continent. In fact, so called 'green' cars haven't generated hype like this since the first hybrids, Honda's Insight and the first-generation Toyota Prius. Arguably, those cars - being Japanese and not domestic alternatives - couldn't engender such lofty expectations and excitement. Here are the Numbers relative to this hotly anticipated plug-in hybrid. Oh, and follow this link to read previous GCBC Volt-related posts.

-----


2000 - year in which General Motors pulled the plug on the GM EV1 electric car program

2010 - year in which we expect to see production Chevrolet Volts driven by real people on real roads

78 - percent of American car owners who drive their vehicles less than 40 miles per day, the approximate distance the Volt should be able to operate exclusively electric

6 - total hours needed to charge Chevy's Volt by way of a normal outlet

28 - percentage of greenhouse gases generated by transportation in the USA

17 - estimated percentage increase in electric-power consumption were the whole U.S. vehicle fleet to convert to electric operation; while gasoline consumption would fall about 70%

40,000 - price, in USD, according to GM's Vice Chairman Bob Lutz when the Volt hits dealers

0 - dollars earned by General Motors, according to Mr. Lutz, for each Chevrolet Volt that the corporation manages to sell

DUAL-CLUTCH TRANSMISSIONS EXCEL

Pre-forgive any accidental absences from this list. Members of the Volkswagen Group, from Volkswagen itself through Audi; Seat; and Bugatti, have made good use of their Direct Shift Gearbox. The DSG has gone by more than one name, but complaints are few and far between.

If you're transmission is capable of being shifted manually by paddles or automatically and can do so with lightning speed (gear 2 is pre-selected when gear 1 is in use; gear 3 when gear 2 is in use and so on), it's easy to figure that.... hey, we're on to something.

Mitsubishi and Nissan have used performance cars to aid their jump onto the bandwagon with the Lancer Evolution X and GT-R. And despite the fact that one of the planet's most famous inexpensive performance cars makes use of a DSG (VW GTI), ignoring the fact that one of the world's most visually stunning automobiles uses a DSG (Audi TT), forgetting that the Evo and GT-R are Japanese performance icons and shift with the benefit of dual clutches, and disregarding the Bugatti Veyron and its ridiculous speed; expense; and power - it is Porsche that takes technology and propels it into the mainstream knowledge base. 

Statistics help; even if price and volume should pair to keep Porsche-used tech out of the limelight. Around Germany's famed Nurburgring, Porsche's 911 Carrera S takes the twists and turns eight seconds quicker with their PDK than it will with a manual trans (7:50 plays 7:58). Increased power helps the regular Carrera exceed the previous car's 'Ring time by four seconds, as well. The Porsche Doppelkupplung transmission replaces the Tiptronic automatic and shifts its seven speeds 60% faster while also providing better fuel efficiency than the manual-trans equipped 911s.


Wednesday, June 18, 2008

LINK AND TECH OF THE DAY: Live Racing From Your Sofa

GoodCarBadCar.net is displaying some slight design changes today; hopefully soft enough that all you'll manage to notice is a more enjoyable viewing experience. Open concept, we'll call it. While those changes are being signed off, direct your attention to the BBC

News has surfaced that a company named iOpener Media wants you to drive amongst real live race action through your gaming system. Sure, your Xbox 360 or Playstation3 won't enable the on-circuit drivers to see and respond to you - but you'll be forced to respond to their actions. 

Problems that inevitably surface include, but are not limited to: connections, ease-of-success, and expense. The first problem arises at random when you enlist your system to battle with friend and foe, so that's nothing new. Secondly, some people love winning. Traditionally, games have overestimated the capability of the car/user combo and allowed the gamer to perform more successfully than possible in the non-virtual world, aka, the "real" world. The latter issue is an obvious factor with any new technology; one that would be lessened if the data from the race is saveable or recordable, thereby offering the in-home gamer time apart from the actual race day to compete in "that race". Follow the link to catch the details.

HORSEPOWER PER $ - CORVETTE ZR1

USD pricing has been announced for the ultimate General Motors vehicle. Chevrolet's Corvette ZR1 has been locked in at $103,300. However, every buyer is going to pay another $1,700 for the gas guzzler tax. Beyond that, some customers will choose chrome wheels at $2,000. Apart from that, options appear limited to a massive package. $10,000 nets you improved seats, better stereo, navi, and more cowhide.

For the purpose of this comparison, forget the options that limit the price of the Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 to $105,000. Position the Corvette Z06, basic Corvette, Nissan GT-R, Porsche 911 GT3, and the least expensive Chevrolet in America alongside. In the USA, those cars are priced at $72,125; $46,950; $69,850; $107,500; and $10,895, respectively. The Numbers you'll want to understand the horsepower/$ quotient for these cars are listed below.

Don't ignore the fact that there's plenty more involved in producing a performance car than placing a huge engine under the hood. Chevrolet engineered many significant improvements into the Z06 version of the Corvette before even more significant changes to the ZR1. Horsepower is only one element.

-----

105.8 - dollars required to purchase one Chevrolet Aveo horsepower

109.2 - dollars required to purchase one Chevrolet Corvette horsepower

142.8 - dollars required to purchase one Chevrolet Corvette Z06 horsepower

145.5 - dollars required to purchase one Nissan GT-R horsepower

164.6 - dollars required to purchase one Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 horsepower

259 - dollars required to purchase one Porsche 911 GT3 horsepower

Stop by CorvetteGuys.com and check out
their large inventory of ZR1 Wheels

FIORINO vs FIORANO

Differences quickly manifest themselves in a comparison of these corporate cousins. Perhaps "cousin" is terminology that Ferrari, the world's most famous and capable supercar maker, would prefer we drop. However, for cutesy; pointless; but fun comparisons, the Fiat Fiorino Qubo and Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano pair up wonderfully.

Where the Turin-based Fiat makes do with an 'I', the Modena-based Ferrari names its car with an 'A' in the midst; after the test track that Ferrari's Formula 1 racers and road cars have been using for 36 years.

Check the Numbers below to learn about more of the astounding differences between two similarly named vehicles; two vehicles that filter money back to many of the same coffers.

-----

4 - total passenger doors (two rear-hinged) built into the Fiat, double the total of the Ferrari

620 - horsepower available to the Fiorano driver, 545 more than the Fiorino's 1.3L  generates

13 - number of Fiat Fiorinos you could have for the price of 1 Ferrari Fiorano

39 - extra miles the Fiat Fiorino Qubo 1.3L MultiJet will travel on a U.S. gallon of fuel above and beyond the Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano

490 - grams per kilometre of C02 emissions exiting the tailpipe of the Fiorano, while Fiat offers a Fiorino that's already very close (if not past) to meeting the frightening Euro emissions target of 120g/km

10 - turning circle, measured in metres, of the Fiat Fiorino, some 2.5 metres tighter than that of the Ferrari Fiorano